# Sync Move Absolute  Gear Absolute Comparison

**URL:** <https://forum.deltamotion.com/t/sync-move-absolute-gear-absolute-comparison/476>\
**Category:** RMCTools\
**Created:** [December 10, 2018, 4:20pm UTC](https://forum.deltamotion.com/t/sync-move-absolute-gear-absolute-comparison/476 "2018-12-10T16:20:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mars\_bruce\_lee](https://forum.deltamotion.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/a587f6/32.png) [@mars\_bruce\_lee](https://forum.deltamotion.com/u/mars_bruce_lee)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2018, 4:20pm UTC](https://forum.deltamotion.com/t/sync-move-absolute-gear-absolute-comparison/476/1 "2018-12-10T16:20:12Z")

</div>

The synchronization between the two physical axes can use Sync Move Absolute and Gear Absolute.  
If the effect of the two is the same？Currently used is Sync Move Absolute .  
The problem currently encountered is that the slave axis must stop when the master is stuck.However, using Sync Move Absolute, it is found that the slave axis continues to move toward the target position even if the master encounters jamming.  
Is it possible to avoid this problem with Gear Absolute?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jacob\_Paso](https://forum.deltamotion.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/439d5e/32.png) [@Jacob\_Paso](https://forum.deltamotion.com/u/Jacob_Paso)\
**Post date:** [December 10, 2018, 5:11pm UTC](https://forum.deltamotion.com/t/sync-move-absolute-gear-absolute-comparison/476/2 "2018-12-10T17:11:58Z")

</div>

With the Sync Move Absolute, if you place both axes in the same halt group, then if one axis halts (meaning that the Halted Status Bit turns on), then all axes in the halt group will stop. The Halt Groups is in the Axis Parameter, All tab, Halts section.

The Gear Absolute command could also work for this situation.